Text complexity is an issue that many students run into.
Unfortunately increasing a student’s ability to read complex texts requires
them to try to read material that is out of their comfort level. This concept
is almost identical to Vygotsky’s scaffolding theory. His theory is that students
need to gradually be pushed to the step that is just out of their reach, so
that eventually they will be at that level. If a student keeps reading books
that they feel comfortable with, they will most likely be very efficient at
that level, but they don’t have the ability to improve in more complex texts. Chapter
six of Best Practices in Adolescent
Literacy Instruction puts it this way; “The notion that skills do not
improve much once they become automatic is one reason teachers who use repeated
reading of texts to build reading fluency do not involve students in reading
the same passage a dozen times…students generally develop sufficient fluency
with the passage, and further practice is mostly a waste of time….challenging
tasks are required to improve skills (p. 111-112).” This isn’t going to be an
easy or enjoyable process, because most people don’t enjoy trying to do
difficult things that they are not good at.
In general, math isn’t something that is easy to read. Math
textbooks have one purpose in mind and that is not to entertain the reader with
clever literary tactics or suspenseful story plots. The goal is to portray the
material in a clear and dry-cut manner. Therefore, I would say that
mathematical texts do not generally become more complex in terms of text
structure, but rather in relation to the more difficult topics with which they
deal with. Math builds upon itself. To understand new concepts, you must have a
comfortable understanding with prior knowledge. This also adds a certain
complexity to math texts because often it is assumes that the reader knows how
to apply what they know to the new processes.
Chapter six of Best
Practices in Adolescent Literacy Instruction also discusses deliberate
practice. According to the text, there are three main components that teachers
need to take into consideration in order to effectively provide deliberate
literacy-related practices for their students. These three points are
“previously acquired abilities, steady progression of difficulty, and
immediate, valid feedback (p. 108).” Teachers who develop good readers into
even better readers are able to do this when they keep those three components
of deliberate practice in mind.
Hinchman, K. A., & Sheridan-Thomas, H. K. (2008). Best practices in adolescent literacy instruction. New York: Guilford Press.
No comments:
Post a Comment